I’ve been thinking a lot lately about the approximately 80 glajillion social networking/social media applications out there these days and the amount of time it takes to be active in them. Obviously I cannot actively participate in hundreds of networks – at least not with anything worthwhile, so I pick and choose and see what applications look helpful or interesting. Sometimes I’ll try a new site or application because a friend recommends it, but not always. Sometimes I’ll read some tech blogs and see what they’re talking about and how they feel about something before I dive in. I’ve found myself joining sites just so I can say “Yep, I have an account there, and yes I’ve tried it”, but what good is that doing? If you’re not actively participating in the site/network then how do you *really* know what the value is?
I tend to feel lately, that there’s so much of a rush to try the latest and greatest, up and coming “new thing” that it’s almost as though we’re stuck on the information super highway of social apps – speeding along, signing up for this thing and that thing without any real idea how it might help us. Just full speed ahead, packing more into every day, squeezing more “to-do” items into our lives.
As we were driving down the highway yesterday I started to think about how the internet really does feel like the “Information Super Highway” these days. On long trips, I tend to be a person that avoids large highways even though I know they’re the fastest route from point A to point B. I stress when traffic becomes heavy and claustrophobia sets in. I look for the nearest exit to get me to a small, quiet back road that will head in the same direction as the highway, but allow me time to see some scenery, some people, and smaller towns. I can see how the people live in certain areas and get a feel of the community there. The big highway doesn’t afford me that opportunity. I’m going as fast as is allowed, all in the desire to get to my destination as quickly as possible, but I’m missing all the good stuff along the way.
I’m starting to feel the same way about social networking. I am a geek, I love online communities, new gadgets, and the new shiny things that come our way on a daily basis. That being said, none of those things matter if you never take the time to look around and see who’s living in your online communities. If we continue burning gas, putting the pedal to the floor in the hopes that we’ll be the first to sign up and use every new thing that comes along, we’ll miss all the good stuff.
When I first joined my friend Syene’s BBS in my local town, my online community was all about the ‘local’ people. We had picnics, we met together and played L.O.R.D. and got to know each other. When the first internet provider showed up and we connected to the rest of the world, then the local community died down a bit for me because I was amazed at the idea of meeting people from all over the world. I traveled all over the US, Canada and Europe meeting people in person that I’d met online and it truly changed my perspectives on many levels. Now, interestingly, I find myself using my online communities to focus, once again, on my local community. I’m certainly still keeping in touch with what people are doing outside my local area, but the most rewarding relationships I have these days are right here in my hometown.
It feels good to take the back roads again.








10 responses so far ↓
Syene // July 21, 2008 at 7:49 pm |
I still have Syene’s Machine on a hard drive frozen in time on the day we shut her down. I just can’t bring myself to toss that thing. There are unfinished conversations, unpublished poetry, and a tavern with a very rowdy crowd asleep but in an odd way still alive in there. Real community is shared moments and memories creating a communal history for everyone involved. So much of what I see in what many call “community” today is talking for the sake of talking . . . that’s not community. Frenetic-attention-seeking-arm-waving screaming LOOK AT ME does not create community. We need more listeners, or at least more talkers also willing listen. But, ya know, that’s just my opinion.
Natalie // July 21, 2008 at 8:00 pm |
I enjoyed reading your post, Shannon. It was refreshing for me to consider that someone I know primarily from my virtual connections, and that I’ve seen as a social networking innovator, occasionally puts on the brakes when it comes to adopting the “latest and greatest” in social networking services. In a stroke of synchronicity, I posted recently to my own blog (http://www.personal.psu.edu/nfh102/blogs/natalies_blog/2008/07/new-title.html) thoughts about my own sense of caution in approaching new social networking tools. Take a read when you get a chance.
Anne Petersen // July 21, 2008 at 8:05 pm |
Just thought I’d share my favorite recent illustration of social networking overkill. But also that I totally agree with you. That too.
Steve Nimmons // July 21, 2008 at 8:12 pm |
I think social networking needs an element of ‘real world’ relationships and local community focus is certainly a good approach. The exponential amount of networks, apps and sprawl of friends across disparate platforms does cause me some ‘annoyance’. I want to see more aggregation – a portal from which I can see all friends activity across all platforms. Flock has improved my life (oh dear!) and a few others are heading in a unifying direction (I hope!)…
micala // July 21, 2008 at 8:41 pm |
Syene,
I completely agree with you, too. We need to be better at LISTENING and not so much yelling for people to notice us. I think that first, though, we need to listen to ourselves. I worry that with all the rush to join everything new and do the whole “LOOK AT ME!” thing, we’ll forget to look at ourselves and remember who we are.
All of this started with YOU!
micala // July 21, 2008 at 8:43 pm |
Natalie,
I will most definitely check out that post. Thanks so much for commenting. For me, it’s not even so much ‘caution’ because I’m always willing to try something out and see what it’s like, but we need to always stop and think about what’s the best tool and what do we hope to achieve from this. Most of the time, “Everything” is way too much. We need to think about ways to work smarter and make connections more easily.
micala // July 21, 2008 at 8:44 pm |
Anne,
That’s almost exactly how I feel lately and although I’m sure this is just a ’social networking ‘boom we’re going through right now, I do think that we’ll end up on the other side of this phase with more ways to connect to each other. I can’t wait to see what comes next.
That was fantastic.
micala // July 21, 2008 at 8:45 pm |
Steve,
I also think you are right here. To make true, lasting connections real-life meetings are important for me. The people that I’ve met online and then have met in real-life and the people I truly call ‘friends’ and feel I can count on. I think (hope) we’ll find more and more ways to aggregate content and make all of this stuff easier to handle.
Will Diehl // July 21, 2008 at 10:24 pm |
Hi,
I enjoyed your post and all the comments (dialogue) so far. Your “stop and think” warning reminded me of a John Dewey quote that I mentioned once (see below) – Dewey was saying the same thing in the 30’s and I think it’s great that it’s being repeated – and given human nature, each generation’s short memory (lack of historical education and perspective?) and inclination to try and reinvent the wheel, it will need to be repeated –
I like Syene’s comment on the lack of dialogue as well… There’s an excellent book on that topic that I picked up after Michael G. Moore mentioned it in an editorial in the American Journal of Distance Education (http://www.ajde.com/) last year is “Dialogue in Teaching: Theory and Practice” by Nicholas Burbules. Moore has also been stressing the importance of dialogue in distance education for years.
The Dewey quote (and Dewey reference) is mentioned in this paper http://www2.open.ac.uk/r06/conference/CambridgeConferencePapers1.pdf (pages 76-83) and you can also read about my thoughts on social networking and Second Life at the time if you feel like it – The entire proceedings from this conference might be interesting to the folks here – it gives a perspective on lessons learned using the new technologies in education and the papers are written by authors from all over the world – so it has an international perspective that might be interesting and useful … the full proceedings are here: http://www2.open.ac.uk/r06/conference/CambridgeConferencePapersIndex2007.htm
Will
micala // July 21, 2008 at 11:55 pm |
Thanks so much Will – the information you’ve presented here is really valuable. I did look at your thoughts on social networking/Second Life as well. I think the dialogue is exactly what we’re searching for – all of us. I think that’s how we build community and grow.